hamadyads have been driven by scince from wood. Why

 Hi guys

The true daughter of old time is science    the poet heart is wonders in the imaginative world but science checks its flight telling him to the realty
@Diana,the goddess of moon
Nymph hamadyads have been driven by scince from wood.
Why
Its real SCiNcist
There is not difference between the working of scientist that of any ordinary indivisal. The only difference between the method of working of the two is that a man of science taken more precations than an ordinary man taken .the nature of inquiry of scientist is more obtruse and he does not leave crack,flaw in his hypothesis.
All men are scientist by this phrase, we means that all men generally adopt same method of working that
A scientist adopts. A scientist uses his reason and draws a conclusion this is done by almost all men.a hypothesis is a guest formed on the basis of reason and experiement. It is necessary that we should verify a hyphothesis to affim that the conclusion drawns by us is found the same everywhere so that the conclusion drawn by us is found the same everywhere so that others  may benefitted by our conclusion
A man of science employs his inductive and deductive method of reasoning to draw general conclusion from particlur indtances .it means that a scientist wrings from nature certain other thing which are called natural laws.
The scientist method is not any specific method .the method of scientific investigation is nothing but the expreesion of the necesary mode of working of scientist  human mind.it is simple mode at which all phenomena are reasoned about rendered precise and exact .the same method at which  the same method is used  by every individual in his daily life.
Ordinary people make hyphothesis on the basis of reason and experiement scientists also employ the same train of reasoning that are used by ordimary people the only difference between the two is that scientist nature of inquary  people .the only diffrence between the two is that scientist nature of inquiry is more obtruse and every step is watched most carefully
The method of ordinary individuals are diffrent from those of scientist in the sense that the letter are more careful in drawing their conclusions and they do so intentionally by making a number of experiements .the universal experience of mankind verifies it. While it is not so with the former .the methods of ordinary individual lack accuracy of a scientist methods.
Scientists investigation is a kind of modern black art.  Sir francis bacons was a great deductive scientist.there is no difference between the method of a baker or a butcher and a scientist.
All raw and green apples are sour.
The method of establishing laws in science is exactly the same as that followed in common life
85   _______
How does an ordinary  individualsusr  to methods of scientific investigation what is the hyphothesis? Why is it necessary that we should verify a  hyphothesis
?
Nowadays computers are very hence they are spreading in the world .now people think that their children should remain incomputerrateThe true daughter of old time is science the poet heart is wonders in the imaginative world but science checks its flight telling him to the realty @Diana,the goddess of moon Nymph hamadyads have been driven by scince from wood. Why Its real SCiNcist There is not difference between the working of scientist that of any ordinary indivisal. The only difference between the method of working of the two is that a man of science taken more precations than an ordinary man taken .the nature of inquiry of scientist is more obtruse and he does not leave crack,flaw in his hypothesis. All men are scientist by this phrase, we means that all men generally adopt same method of working that A scientist adopts. A scientist uses his reason and draws a conclusion this is done by almost all men.a hypothesis is a guest formed on the basis of reason and experiement. It is necessary that we should verify a hyphothesis to affim that the conclusion drawns by us is found the same everywhere so that the conclusion drawn by us is found the same everywhere so that others may benefitted by our conclusion A man of science employs his inductive and deductive method of reasoning to draw general conclusion from particlur indtances .it means that a scientist wrings from nature certain other thing which are called natural laws. The scientist method is not any specific method .the method of scientific investigation is nothing but the expreesion of the necesary mode of working of scientist human mind.it is simple mode at which all phenomena are reasoned about rendered precise and exact .the same method at which the same method is used by every individual in his daily life. Ordinary people make hyphothesis on the basis of reason and experiement scientists also employ the same train of reasoning that are used by ordimary people the only difference between the two is that scientist nature of inquary people .the only diffrence between the two is that scientist nature of inquiry is more obtruse and every step is watched most carefully The method of ordinary individuals are diffrent from those of scientist in the sense that the letter are more careful in drawing their conclusions and they do so intentionally by making a number of experiements .the universal experience of mankind verifies it. While it is not so with the former .the methods of ordinary individual lack accuracy of a scientist methods. Scientists investigation is a kind of modern black art. Sir francis bacons was a great deductive scientist.there is no difference between the method of a baker or a butcher and a scientist. All raw and green apples are sour. The method of establishing laws in science